No, it is in webapps (all the widgets work is there) - try: [email protected]
Cheers! David. -----Original Message----- From: Ricardo Varela [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: 02 July 2010 09:02 To: David Rogers Subject: Re: question about number of occurrences of author and content elements (in Widget packaging spec) mmm... is widget packaging and configuration... isn;t that in DAP? did i got the mails wrong? --- ricardo On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 3:42 PM, David Rogers <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ricardo - did you mean to send that to webapps rather than DAP? > > Cheers, > > > David. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] > [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ricardo Varela > Sent: 02 July 2010 04:57 > To: [email protected]; Marcos Caceres > Subject: question about number of occurrences of author and content elements > (in Widget packaging spec) > > hallo all, hallo Marcos, > > We have a small question regarding what we interpret may be an > inconsistency in the behaviours for parsing a config file as commented > in the W3C widget packaging spec [1] > > According to the spec (latest and also older versions), the > occurrences of some elements (eg: author or content) have to be zero > or one > > However, on the algorithm to process a configuration document quoted > below, it states: "If this is not the first author element > encountered, then the user agent must ignore this element and any > child nodes" It just says ignore and doesn't say to consider it as > error > > Isn't this a contradiction in the parsing of the configuration > document? We understand that it should be one of these 2 cases: > > a) we allow for more than one instance of author and content and let > the first one take precedence (and therefore the occurrences should be > "zero or more") > b) we allow only one instance of author and content elements (and > therefore the parsing algorithm has got to stop with error on further > occurrences) > > Would appreciate some clarification about this, as we want to clarify > what to do for our compliance tests > > Thanks a lot in advance! > > Saludos! > > [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/ > > -- > Ricardo Varela - http://phobeo.com - http://twitter.com/phobeo > "Though this be madness, yet there's method in 't" > > -- Ricardo Varela - http://phobeo.com - http://twitter.com/phobeo "Though this be madness, yet there's method in 't"
