That would do the trick, yes. Thanks for pointing it out, all my w3 spec reading skills are belong to you.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2010 at 4:44 PM, Shawn Wilsher <[email protected]> wrote: > On 7/5/2010 3:19 AM, Nathan Kitchen wrote: >> >> There are a couple of ways to do this: > > I think you missed one. IDBDatabase has a property objectStores [1] that is > an array of object stores. Additionally, IDBObjectStore has a property > called indexNames [2] that is an array of indexes for the object store. We > should probably look into having the same naming convention for both of > those (objectStores and indexes or objectStoreNames and indexNames > probably?). > > This accomplishes what you want, right? > > Cheers, > > Shawn > > [1] > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#widl-IDBDatabase-objectStores > [2] > http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html#widl-IDBObjectStore-indexNames > >
