On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 11:12:27 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]>
wrote:
On Tue, 07 Sep 2010 10:47:01 +0200, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]>
wrote:
For what it's worth, we still throw WRONG_DOCUMENT_ERR in a few places
in gecko:
http://mxr.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/search?string=WRONG_DOCUMENT_ERR&find=\.cpp
Well, you have the same situation if the call is made by a mutation
event handler if the node-to-be-adopted has a parent. There is also
the situation where createDocument is called and passed a doctype
node, which already has a non-null ownerDocument.
In short, I'd encourage you to go through the search results linked to
above.
Thanks! So if we were to define this properly would that mean mutation
events would have to be defined as part of DOM Core? (And DOM Core have a
dependency on DOM Events.)
Is it still likely we can get rid of mutation events and replace them?
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
