You can put two versions of the function into the idl. Both have the same name and same return type, but they take different parameters.
/ Jonas On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 2:40 AM, Jeremy Orlow <[email protected]> wrote: > Seems reasonable to me. Is there any better way to spec it other than > having the parameter be an "any" and having normative text describing how it > works? > J > > On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:11 PM, ben turner <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> The spec currently says that IDBDatabase.transaction() takes an array >> of object store names as its first parameter. While I think this is >> fine I'd like to propose that we loosen that restriction and allow a >> simple string to name one object store as well. Thus this code: >> >> var transaction = database.transaction(["foo"]); >> >> could, additionally, be written as: >> >> var transaction = database.transaction("foo"); >> >> I of course would like the array syntax to continue to be valid for >> one or more object store names. >> >> What do you guys think? >> >> -Ben >> > >
