On Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:43:58 +0200, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:
On 10/26/10 5:27 AM, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Boris, do you see value in the asBlob / responseBlob proposal currently
in the draft?
The idea there being that you don't have to have the data in memory at
all unless the page explicitly asks for it, and then giving the page the
option of only mapping some of the data into memory?
I think that's a good idea, yes.
What I'm not quite sure about is why it needs to be a state flag which
makes it an open-time all-or-nothing decision, other than implementor
convenience....
Okay, so even for responseBlob you think it should be the implementor
handling the complexity. I tend to agree with you and am glad you joined
the discussion.
--
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
