On 04 Apr 2011, at 5:26 PM, Keean Schupke wrote: > This is ignoring the possibility that something like RelationalDB could be > used, where a well defined common subset of SQL can be used (and I use > well-defined in the formal sense). This would allow a relatively thin wrapper > on top of most SQL implementations and would allow SQLite (or BDB) to be used > as the backend.
Yes, if an implementation of RelationalDB arrives which is solid and fast with support for set operations that would be great. The important thing is that we have two competing APIs (and preferably a strong API with a great track record).
