On Mon, May 2, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Israel Hilerio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> Excellent! I think that should mean that no changes are needed to the >> IndexedDB spec at all. I can't think of any instances where we use specific >> interface names while still accepting null values. >> >> / Jonas > > This implies the bug can be resolved, correct?
Unless someone points out any specific functions in the API that needs clarification, I think we should close the bug yes. / Jonas
