2011/5/11 timeless <timel...@gmail.com>: > With this model, i'd want the UA to provide instances for words which > are misspelled according to its standard dictionary but which are in > its user's custom dictionary. The web page can try to make > suggestions, but generally the UA will choose to ignore the words > because it knows that the user is happy with the current word.
This is tricky if the author's spellcheck breaks words differently from the built-in spellcheck. Also, the website might have its own idea of the user's custom dictionary, which might be more correct than the browser's (like if all Google sites tracked a custom dictionary for you and you were using someone else's computer). And the author's spellcheck might actually be flagging a grammar error, or using context-sensitive info to figure out that even though a particular word is fine in general it's a mistake here. So I'd be hesitant to say anything like this.
