On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Eric U <[email protected]> wrote: >> It was likely just an oversight on my part that they differ. >> It does seem a bit odd to dispatch error/abort/loadend if aborting >> with no write in progress, so I favor the FileWriter/FileSaver >> behavior, but as long as they match, I'm not too bothered. > > For what it's worth, FileReader.abort() currently follows what > XHR.abort() does, which is to do nothing if called in the "wrong" > state. I.e. no events are aborted and no exceptions are thrown.
Ah, my mistake; I was reading http://www.w3.org/TR/FileAPI/#abort instead of http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/FileAPI/#abort.
