On 5/23/11 2:23 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Editorial comments, section 9 #4 typo "Optionaly", also formatting in section 9 item 3 number 7.
Fixed.
You might want dates for the SIgnature 1.1 and Signature Properties References?
I'm only putting dates on specs that have reached REC status. This is to avoid implementers looking at outdated specs.
Relying on XML Signature 1.1 for normative algorithm requirements is sensible in my personal opinion.
Absolutely! It's takes a away what was becoming a huge headache. Kind regards, Marcos
