http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12917
Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|INVALID | --- Comment #4 from Adrian Bateman [MSFT] <[email protected]> 2011-06-21 23:26:15 UTC --- The point of extensions is that they are not a mandatory part of the spec. They are not required for interop. It is perfectly possible to make a client and service work without deflate-stream. Just as the extension is optional for a service, it should be optional for a client. I don't understand why this is an interoperability nightmare - it's part of the extensibility mechanism in the protocol. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
