On 30 Jun 2011, at 14:55, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Given the lack of support for stopping work on Web Storage [1], I'd let to > get consensus on the plan to move it to Last Call Working Draft. > > Currently there are two open bugs: > > 1. Bug 12111: "spec for Storage object getItem(key) method does not match > implementation behavior". PLH created a version of the spec that addresses > this bug [12111-fix].
> > 2. Bug 13020: "No user agent will implement the storage mutex so this passage > does not reflect reality". > > There are different opinions on the priority of Web Storage ... > > * Web Storage is a low priority and the Editor will get to it when he gets to > it > > * Web Storage is a high priority because the lack of a LCWD will block at > least the Widget Interface spec from progressing on the Rec track > > There are various options on what to do next, including: > > 1. Fix 12111 and 13020 and move Web Storage to LCWD +1 > > 2. Leave Web Storage as is and eventually implementations will match the spec > > 3. Do #1 in one version of the spec and keep #2 as a separate version of the > spec (e.g. L1 and L2). > > Comments on these options are welcome. > > If you prefer #1, please indicate if you are willing to create a fix/patch > for bug 13020. Yes. > > -AB > > [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2011AprJun/1110.html > [12111] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=12111 > [12111-fix] http://www.w3.org/2011/06/Web%20Storage.html > [13020] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13020 > >
