On 7/2/2011 8:50 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 7/2/11 1:46 PM, John J. Barton wrote:
2) element transformation. The replacement fires "after" a mutation.
Library or tools that want to transform the application dynamically want
to get notification "before" the mutation. A common solution then is
to bracket changes:
"beforeChange" or "onModelChanging"
"afterChange" or "onModelChanged"

This really only works if you trust the listeners. The browser core can't trust scripted listeners using Web APIs.....
I don't understand what 'trust' means here. I am not proposing any change to the privileges of listeners. How can the browser core "trust" an 'onModelChanged' listener but not an 'onModelChanging' listener?

 So, for example, I can't see how to implement
JS pre-processing using only the after event. (This may not be
possible with the current mutation events either, but it is something
I want to to).

It's not clear that you need a web-facing API for your use case, though....
If you consider the Web a read-only service, with 'write' restricted to non-Web technologies, then lots of things are easier I agree. But if you believe as I do that the Web should be fully functional then we should push to make improvements. Recompilation of JS, CSS, and HTML is already happening and I expect it to continue to grow. If this use case is excluded from Web API, then non-Web apis will be used.

jjb



-Bori



Reply via email to