On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 1:58 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <rn...@webkit.org> wrote: > > Right. But on the other hand, if this code were to run inside a mutation > observer, it won't work in your proposal either. So the questions is > whether writing a function that depends on state updated by the mutation > observer without a mutation observer, and then later calling it inside a > mutation observer happens frequently enough to annoy developers or not. >
I meant to say *writing a function that depends on state updated by the mutation observer outside mutation observers, and later calling it inside a mutation observer* - Ryosuke
