Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were
no objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC
specification to encourage broader review and comments.
-AB
On 6/30/11 6:46 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
As Cameron indicated in [1], all non-enhancements bugs for Web IDL are
now resolved and as such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a
Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL:
http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/
This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's
decision to request advancement" for this LCWD.
Note the Process Document states the following regarding the
significance/meaning of a LCWD:
[[
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call
Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:
* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant
technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document)
in the Working Draft;
* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant
dependencies with other groups;
* other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these
dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement
is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the
technical report to later maturity levels.
]]
Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence
will be considered as agreement with the proposal. The deadline for
comments is July 7. Please send all comments to:
public-script-co...@w3.org
-Art Barstow
