Although there are ongoing discussions regarding exceptions, there were no objections to this CfC. As such, I will request publication of a LC specification to encourage broader review and comments.

-AB

On 6/30/11 6:46 AM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:
As Cameron indicated in [1], all non-enhancements bugs for Web IDL are now resolved and as such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a Last Call Working Draft of Web IDL:

  http://dev.w3.org/2006/webapi/WebIDL/

This CfC satisfies the group's requirement to "record the group's decision to request advancement" for this LCWD.

Note the Process Document states the following regarding the significance/meaning of a LCWD:

[[
http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#last-call

Purpose: A Working Group's Last Call announcement is a signal that:

* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied its relevant technical requirements (e.g., of the charter or requirements document) in the Working Draft;

* the Working Group believes that it has satisfied significant dependencies with other groups;

* other groups SHOULD review the document to confirm that these dependencies have been satisfied. In general, a Last Call announcement is also a signal that the Working Group is planning to advance the technical report to later maturity levels.
]]

Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence will be considered as agreement with the proposal. The deadline for comments is July 7. Please send all comments to:

    public-script-co...@w3.org

-Art Barstow




Reply via email to