On 8/2/11 8:20 AM, ext Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Tue, 02 Aug 2011 13:10:25 +0200, Anne van Kesteren
<[email protected]> wrote:
Can we at least make it so that [email protected] stays the list
for technical discussion on CORS? We already switched mailing lists
once (twice if you count going from the initial proposal on
[email protected] to [email protected]) and I would like to
avoid doing it again. Getting feedback is hard enough as it is,
requiring all relevant people to subscribe to yet another list would
be bad.
If that is not possible I think I would prefer CORS and From-Origin
to stay in the WebApps WG.
The From-Origin spec is WebApps'; it is _not_ a joint deliverable with
the proposed WebAppSec WG.
I discussed this with Thomas on IRC (not logged) and he hopes that
doing this work in a new group will open up new resources to get it
moving along (e.g. to get a test suite). I am fairly skeptical, but we
agreed that trying it out for half a year should be okay given the low
activity of this work here in WebApps. If nothing much has changed the
work moves back to WebApps, which should work per charters of both
groups.
Did you guys agree on the "which list will CORS use going forward?"
question?
I agree it can be a bit painful to subscribe to YA list but I think it
has the advantage of getting some "new eyes" on the spec as well as the
advantages mentioned above.
-AB
