Approved! :) Thanks very much! On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 7:49 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Dear Marcos Caceres , > > The XML Security Working Group has reviewed the comments you sent [1] on > the Last Call Working Draft [2] of the XML Signature Syntax and Processing > Version 1.1 published on 3 Mar 2011. Thank you for having taken the time to > review the document and to send us comments! > > The Working Group's response to your comment is included below. > > Please review it carefully and let us know by email at > [email protected] if you agree with it or not before 22 August 2011. In > case of disagreement, you are requested to provide a specific solution for > or a path to a consensus with the Working Group. If such a consensus cannot > be achieved, you will be given the opportunity to raise a formal objection > which will then be reviewed by the Director during the transition of this > document to the next stage in the W3C Recommendation Track. > > Thanks, > > For the XML Security Working Group, > Thomas Roessler > W3C Staff Contact > > 1. > http://www.w3.org/mid/[email protected] > 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/CR-xmldsig-core1-20110303/ > > > ===== > > Your comment on : >> Add link and informative reference to XML SIgnature Best Practices >> document to XML Signature 1.1 introduction. > > > Working Group Resolution (LC-2504): > Editors draft has been updated with text in introduction and reference. > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-xmlsec/2011Aug/0003.html > > Text added to editors draft: > > "The Working Group encourages implementers and developers to read XML > Signature Best Practices [XMLDSIG-BESTPRACTICES]. It contains a number of > best practices related to the use of XML Signature, including > implementation considerations and practical ways of improving security." > > http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/Overview.html#sec-Introduction > > > ---- > > >
-- Marcos Caceres http://datadriven.com.au
