> > According to the text, I would expect negative infinity to be the > > lowest possible key, and the highest possible key to be undefined > > (because an array of any candidate highest key followed by another > > valid key would be even higher) > > Yes. You are correct. > > / Jonas >
I rewrote the note to say the following and published to the Editor's Draft: As a result of the above rules, negative infinity is the lowest possible value for a key. There is no highest possible key value. This is because an array of any candidate highest key followed by another valid key is even higher. Thanks so much, Eliot
