On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 8:25 AM, Anne van Kesteren <[email protected]> wrote: > I think defining all of these in one specification is fine. Currently the > specification is only 37 pages when printed. That will certainly grow once > we add ranges, examples, and more introductory text, but will also still be > well below the larger specifications. (Jonas' concern is already addressed > in the specification with notes that reference the other relevant places in > case a feature (so far only some constructor methods on Document) is defined > across sections.)
Is this explicitly mentioned in the spec? Otherwise how will anyone be able to take advantage of this fact? / Jonas
