Hi Marcos,
On 9/16/11 10:14 AM, ext Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Friday, 16 September 2011 at 20:04, Arthur Barstow wrote:
Marcos, All,
To clearly state that WebApps' work on the Widget Requirements and
Widget Landscape documents has ended, I propose they be published as
Working Group Notes:
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-land/
http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-reqs/
I think only the requirements should be published, because it was actually
pretty useful in informing the standards development process. It's actually a
pretty good document, if I do say so myself :)
FYI, there is some precedence for publishing Requirements docs as
Recommendations (e.g. OWL UCs and Reqs) . If we want to go that route,
it would presumably mean publishing a LC, skipping CR (not applicable
for this spec) and then going to PR and REC. WDYT? Too much "make work"?
The landscape document was just created to inform the standardisation process
of what was considered best practice at the time. If it's a W3C requirement
that it be published as a WG Note, then it should be published as is (i.e., I
don't wanna do any work on it unless I really have to).
I don't feel real strongly here (and I will check with PLH on the
publishing requirements). Publishing a WG Note does make a clear
statement that work on the spec has stopped. We could also update the
SotD which is quite old (e.g. still points to the appformats lists).
[BTW, I would be willing to help with the edits.]
-AB
