http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=14214
Glenn Adams <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED Resolution|WONTFIX | --- Comment #3 from Glenn Adams <[email protected]> 2011-10-21 06:51:16 UTC --- I would like to see an either a link from the use of Transferable to the definition in HTML5 or an explicit mention of Transferable as a dependent type defined in HTML5. In particular, under 2.1 Dependencies, there is the text: "HTML Many fundamental concepts from HTML are used by this specification. [HTML]" I wish to make certain that every normatively fundamental concept (including types) that are defined in HTML5 and used by this specification are either explicitly linked or are enumerated under 2.1 Dependencies. I would suggest that linking would be preferable to enumerating. G. -- Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
