Marcos Caceres wrote:
On Thursday, November 10, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
It's important to separate Intents as currently proposed and what we
collectively want out of them. In order to move fast we probably don't want to
pile up a zillion features there, but we equally certainly don't want this to
turn into a rubber-stamping exercise. So bring the UCs on!
- Hide quoted message -
Perhaps someone could take the time to describe exactly how a user could
communicate with an existing TV device in their home from a web browser
supporting web intents based on the above requirements?
We actually agreed that folks in the Discovery/Home Networking gang would do
just that, to see if it flies.
Also, a prototype might help here …. i.e., it's not up to the WG to explain how
it does what you want, but up to you to show that it doesn't do something you
want through a prototype (or similar) to do. If your prototype breaks down
because the intents system doesn't work without extensions, then we have
something to work from.
Agree?
Yes. I don't doubt this logic :)
- Rich
