On Sunday, November 13, 2011, Shawn Wilsher <[email protected]> wrote: > On 10/23/2011 3:04 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> >> Good catch! This definitely needs to be specified in the spec. >> >> I have a weak preference for using 1. This has a smaller risk of >> triggering edge cases in the client code since it's always truthy. >> I.e. if someone tries to detect the presence of an id, they won't fail >> due to the id being 0. > > Looks like there was a [loose] consensus around one, but it's not specified as far as I can tell. Should I file a bug or will it get magically fixed with this e-mail?
Please file bug. / Jonas
