On Monday, November 14, 2011 at 7:05 PM, Giuseppe Pascale wrote:
> I would like to point out that there could be other specifications out in
> the wild referencing XHR 1.
>
> This doesn't mean that you should not drop XHR 1, but would be good if the
> WG prepares a (short) note that gives the background around this decision
> and few info about the XHR 2 work, how it differs from XHR 1 and how to
> update references. Such a note could be sent to all (relevant) WGs/IGs
> and for those of us active also in groups outside W3C could be used to
> inform people about the change with some "official" text
Or we could avoid the whole thing and just have:
http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/ redirect to:
http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest2/
Better yet, dump the "2" version number and just have /XMLHttpRequest2/ point
to /XMLHttpRequest/.
Everything in 1 is in 2, so making a big deal out of this is a valuable waste
of time justifying the decision.
There is no point in having "Level 1" and "Level 2" since there is no "Level
1"… there is just "XMLHttpRequest" :)
