On Wednesday, November 23, 2011 at 2:56 PM, Robin Berjon wrote:
> On Nov 23, 2011, at 14:51 , Marcos Caceres wrote: > > > The proposed change would require the spec going back to LC. Is that > > > correct? > > > > > > > > Don't know. The change is cosmetic but needed. > > I would assume not since it should not change runtimes perceptibly. It's a > shuffling around of the way things are defined. > Exactly. I would say it does not need to go back to LC because it doesn't really add anything new (just makes things a bit more clear).
