Works for me. I can live with .matches, but .matchesSelector is too verbose.
Yehuda Katz (ph) 718.877.1325 On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:39 AM, Aryeh Gregor <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 12:19 AM, Yehuda Katz <[email protected]> wrote: > > I like .is, the name jQuery uses for this purpose. Any reason not to go > with > > it? > > We might want it for something else. .matches clearly sounds like > it's selector-related, and I have more trouble thinking of another > meaning we'd ever really want for it. >
