On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 1:08 AM, Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.h...@lachy.id.au> wrote: > On 2011-11-25 03:58, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: >> Alternately, assume that :matches() is eventually changed to allow >> complex selectors. Using :scope there is completely fine. > > I'm not sure what you mean. The current spec for matchesSelector does allow > complex selectors as it's defined to accept a "group of selectors" > (selectors 3 terminology), which is equivalent to a selector list (selectors > 4). But :scope is still only useful when ref nodes are supplied.
Sorry for the confusion - note that I had a colon at the start of the word, so I was referring to the Selector, not the function. ^_^ ~TJ