oops, wrong explain, instead see 
http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmldsig-core-11/explain.html 6.1, 6.2*, 
6.3.1, 6.4.2 (e.g. move away from SHA-1)

regards, Frederick

Frederick Hirsch
Nokia



On Dec 14, 2011, at 2:00 PM, Hirsch Frederick (Nokia-CIC/Boston) wrote:

> Art
> 
> I think switching the dependency to XML Signature 1.0 is a bad idea, noting 
> that 1.1 has fixed errors, and addressed security vulnerabilities, including 
> updates to algorithms (other than ecc) to address known weaknesses.
> 
> details in http://www.w3.org/2008/xmlsec/Drafts/xmlenc-core-11/explain.html, 
> 5.1, 5.5.1, 5.8, 6.6-6.8
> 
> I think the W3 team is actively working on the PAG issue but have no idea 
> when we will see the result - one hope was before year end. 
> 
> regards, Frederick
> 
> Frederick Hirsch
> Nokia
> 
> 
> 
> On Dec 13, 2011, at 1:14 PM, Arthur Barstow wrote:
> 
>> Hi All,
>> 
>> The Widgets DigSig spec [W-DigSig] has been sitting in PR for over 4 months 
>> now, blocked on the Elliptic Curve PAG [ECC-PAG]. AFAICT, this PAG has just 
>> started its unspecified length Fishing Expedition seeking some unspecified 
>> level of funds to pay for some type of analysis that will take some unknown 
>> amount of time to complete ...
>> 
>> Given this, and not wanting to block on the ECC PAG any longer, what are the 
>> options to move widgets-digsig to REC ASAP?
>> 
>> Some options:
>> 
>> 1. Replace [XMLSig1.1] dependency with XMLSig 1.0. I presume this would 
>> require a new 3-week LC but the CR could be zero-length, presumably no 
>> re-testing would be required, and the only thing blocking PR->REC is the 
>> length of the new CfE that would be needed.
>> 
>> 2. Move the tainted algorithm(s) in XMLSig1.1 to XMLSig1.Next so XMLSig1.1 
>> is not affected by the PAG and XMLSig1.1 can then continue on the REC track.
>> 
>> 3. Others?
>> 
>> (#2 seems dead simple so I'm probably missing some things.)
>> 
>> -AB
>> 
>> [W-DigSig] http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets-digsig/
>> [XMLSig1.1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xmldsig-core1/
>> [ECC-PAG] http://www.w3.org/2011/02/xmlsec-pag-charter.html
>> 
> 


Reply via email to