On 2/4/12 10:58 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
Are there more inconsistency between Selectors4 and Selectors API 2?
Given that Selectors API wants to allow strings that aren't valid selectors at all (like "> foo", say), I'd think so.
-Boris
On 2/4/12 10:58 AM, Kang-Hao (Kenny) Lu wrote:
Are there more inconsistency between Selectors4 and Selectors API 2?
Given that Selectors API wants to allow strings that aren't valid selectors at all (like "> foo", say), I'd think so.
-Boris