On Thursday, 19 April 2012 at 16:11, Glenn Adams wrote: > > in that case, please record an objection on my part > > > just to be clear, I mean an objection to publishing as PR unless this is > clarified; i believe this is an issue because the concept and use of origin > is (1) very complex and (2) thus prone to misinterpretation; for example, it > is not well recognized that HTML5 itself does not require a UA to send an > Origin header in a URL request (see [3]) Yes, but those are issue of RFC6454 and the HTML5 spec (as well as Web Storage). But what does this have to do with Widgets?
- [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interface Propos... Arthur Barstow
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interfa... Ian Jacobs
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Int... Arthur Barstow
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget... Marcos Caceres
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Interfa... Marcos Caceres
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget Int... Glenn Adams
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Widget... Marcos Caceres
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocking Wi... Glenn Adams
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocki... Marcos Caceres
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency blocki... Glenn Adams
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependency bl... Marcos Caceres
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependenc... Marcos Caceres
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependenc... Glenn Adams
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependenc... Marcos Caceres
- Re: [widgets] HTML5 dependenc... Glenn Adams
