https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15595
Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC| |[email protected] Resolution| |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Ian 'Hixie' Hickson <[email protected]> 2012-05-02 19:45:25 UTC --- > Comment: > The abstract could be improved by pointing out that "WebSocket protocol" is > defined by the IETF, while this API specifies the browser API to use that > protocol. Done by adding a parenthetical regarding the source of the protocol. (When the abstract was written, the protocol was part of the same spec, IIRC.) > "The send(data) method transmits data using the connection. If the readyState > attribute is CONNECTING, it must throw an InvalidStateError exception." - What > happens for the other non-OPEN states? The very next sentence in the spec answers that already. > "unpaired surrogates" is mentioned in three places, but not defined anywhere. I've changed this to not use a term of art but (it talks about surrogates that are isolated, now), and added a reference to [UNICODE]. > In the same context, "with prejudice" is mentioned multiple > times, only referencing the WebSockets protocol (instead of defining that), > but the protocol doesn't mention that term. The term "with prejudice" is defined at the target of the cross-reference; it controls what events are fired in certain cases. -- Configure bugmail: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.
