Art is correct. I'll incorporate that fix today when I prepare minutes.

----- Original Message -----
From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 08, 2012 01:23 PM
To: public-webapps <[email protected]>; Tantek Çelik 
<[email protected]>; Greg Billock <[email protected]>
Cc: WebIntents <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Draft Minutes: 1 May 2012 f2f meeting

On 5/8/12 1:11 PM, ext Arthur Barstow wrote:

Greg, Tantek, All - I think there is an error in this part of the draft
Web Intents minutes:

[[
http://www.w3.org/2012/05/01-webapps-minutes.html#item06

tantek:do you know about opendoc and ola?
... systems for applications doing this. Have you looked at that?

gbillock:nope
... there is IPR in that area that should be looked at.
... (I know because I did some of it)
]]

Only part of Greg's quote above should be attributed to him and the rest
should be attributed to Tantek. More specifically, here is what I
believe is what they said in this exchange:

[[
http://www.w3.org/2012/05/01-webapps-minutes.html#item06

tantek:do you know about opendoc and ola?
... systems for applications doing this. Have you looked at that?

gbillock:nope

tantek: there is IPR in that area that should be looked at.
... (I know because I did some of it)
... I felt I had an obligation to make that disclosure
]]

Tantek, Greg and Others - what is your recollection on this exchange? Is
my correction above accurate?

-Thanks, Art



---------------------------------------------------------------------
This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential 
information, privileged material (including material protected by the 
solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public 
information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended 
recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, 
please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your 
system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission 
by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

Reply via email to