Le 30/05/12 14:43, Arthur Barstow a écrit :
Chris, Daniel, Peter - when will the CSS WG make a decision on the FPWD?
We'll try to make one today during our weekly conf-call. Please note that we're going to review the bits of this document falling under CSS WG's wings. In particular section 6. Peter and I already have discovered a few things : 1. "position: center" in section 6.1 refers to an Editor's Draft that is not actively discussed at this time. Only normative references should be made to CSS specs or the Fullscreen draft will have to wait until that ED becomes a REC to itself become a REC. 2. the ::backdrop pseudo-element is not explained in the document outside of section 6.2. It's unclear to me why it is needed, what it represents, etc. 3. the parenthesis in section 6.2 seems to me to contain a copy/paste error "above the element below the element" 4. "layer" and "layer 10" in section 6.1 are unclear. "Layer" is used nowhere in CSS references used in this spec. This must be clarified. I note that these 4 points should have been resolved long ago but nobody ever pinged the CSS WG about this document between beginning of february and now. I request that "joint efforts" become really joint efforts, thanks. Outside of the direct scope of the CSS WG, I would personnally add: 1. the definition of requestFullScreen() says what are the steps it should run but it does not even say what feature it provides. I think a sentence saying "The requestFullScreen() method sends a request for the Element to go fullscreen. Please see section 7 for the Security Considerations attached to this method." is needed. 2. allowfullscreen and iframe in section 7 should be hyperlinks. I note the reference is at WHATWG while it should be at W3C. </Daniel>
