On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Øyvind Stenhaug <[email protected]> wrote: >> 4. "layer" and "layer 10" in section 6.1 are unclear. "Layer" is used >> nowhere in CSS references used in this spec. This must be clarified. > > This section also seems to assume that the list in CSS 2.1's appendix E is > for the entire document (e.g. saying "Each browsing context has one > associated viewport and therefore also one top layer"), but it's actually > the painting order of a stacking context, of which there can be several.
Tab, Ian, Robert, so the problem is that even if we create a new stacking context layer, it will still be relative. R is root. R1 and R2 are its children, both creating their own stacking context. R1 has z-index 0 and R2 has z-index 1. Now R1 has a child F. F gets displayed fullscreen in the new "top layer", but will still be behind R2. So we need something else. I'm not entirely sure what would be a good solution though. -- Anne — Opera Software http://annevankesteren.nl/ http://www.opera.com/
