Yehuda, Can you help clarify here whether jQuery's behavior is intentional (i.e. use cases drive the need for executability), or if it's a side-effect of the implementation?
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 7:55 AM, Henri Sivonen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> On Sat, May 19, 2012 at 6:29 AM, Ryosuke Niwa <[email protected]> wrote: >> > There appears to be a consensus to use document.parse (which is fine >> > with >> > me), so I would like to double-check which behavior we're picking. IMO, >> > the >> > only sane choice is to unset the already-started flag since doing >> > otherwise >> > implies script elements parsed by document.parse won't be executed when >> > inserted into a document. >> >> I was expecting document.parse() to make scripts unexecutable. Are >> there use cases for creating executable scripts using this facility? > > > jQuery appears to let script elements run: http://jsfiddle.net/kB8Fp/2/ > > Also, we're talking about using the same algorithm for template element. > I would like script elements inside my template to run. > > - Ryosuke >
