On Aug 13, 2012 4:49 AM, "Florian Bösch" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:12 AM, Michael[tm] Smith <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> There is no conceivable conformance checker that's going to allow the use >> of completely arbitrary tag names. It doesn't matter what formalism it uses. >> To allow custom tag names and still be able to check the conformance of >> normal tag names, the only possibility is to limit the custom tag names to >> some recognized prefix -- e.g., x-fancyButton or whatever. > > <x:fancy-button>
For clarity, you don't mean literally x: right? On the other hand, most people do mean literally x-.
