Interesting. Perhaps that's where CSSOM for Regions could live? :DG<
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 11:19 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > The CSSWG would like to add a new top-level object called "CSS" that > we can hang several functions and constructors off of, so that we can > avoid the excessive verbosity that's probably required if we just put > everything on window. > > (Right now, the only thing we want to add is a "supports()" function, > which is the API version of the upcoming @supports rule. In the > future, we'd like to add things like the CSSOM Value API constructors > to it, so authors can do a simple "new CSS.px(5)" rather than "new > CSSPixelComponentValue(5)".) > > Does anyone see any problems with this? Do we think there's a > significant compat risk to claiming an all-caps "CSS" variable? > > ~TJ >
