On 21 Aug 2012, at 13:20, Arthur Barstow wrote: > Marcos would like to publish a "Proposed Edited Recommendation" [PER] of the > Widget Packaging and XML Configuration spec [REC] to incorporate the spec's > errata and this is a Call for Consensus to do so. > > The [Errata] has already been reflected in the [Proposed-PER] (see [Diff]) > and it includes a new title of "Packaged Web Apps (Widgets) - Packaging and > XML Configuration (Second Edition)". > > Please send all comments regarding this CfC to the public-webapps@w3.org mail > list by August 28 and note silence will be considered as agreement with the > proposal. If you support this CfC, a positive response is preferred and > encouraged.
+1 on the new name, I like it. Just one grammatical nit in the Abstract - there is an extra "as" before "commonly": This specification standardizes a packaging format and metadata for a class of software known as commonly as packaged apps or widgets > > -Thanks, AB > > [PER] <http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#cfr-edited> > [REC] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2011/REC-widgets-20110927/> > [Errata] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/errata.html> > [Proposed-PER] <http://dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/> > [Diff] > <http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A//www.w3.org/TR/widgets/&doc2=http%3A//dev.w3.org/2006/waf/widgets/> > > >
