The comment period for the August 9 LCWD of The WebSocket API [LCWD]
ended on August 30. During that time, two bugs were submitted against
the LCWD ([18623] and [18509]). Both of these bugs requested
non-normative changes and fixes for both of these bugs are included in
the version of the spec I created as a Draft CR [CR-Draft].
As such, this is a Call for Consensus to publish a Candidate
Recommendation of WebSocket API using [CR-Draft] as the basis (see
[Diff] for a difference between [LCWD] and [CR-Draft]).
As noted in the CfC to publish the LCWD [CfC-LCWD], bugs [15209],
[15210], and [17264] remain open (and are not addressed in this version
of the spec).
This CfC satisfies: a) the group's requirement to "record the group's
decision to request advancement" to CR; and b) "General Requirements for
Advancement on the Recommendation Track" as defined in the Process
Document
<http://www.w3.org/2005/10/Process-20051014/tr.html#transition-reqs>.
Positive response to this CfC is preferred and encouraged and silence
will be considered as agreeing with the proposal. The deadline for
comments is September 7 and all comments should be sent to
public-webapps at w3.org.
Thanks, AB
[CR-Draft]
<http://dev.w3.org/html5/websockets/publish/CR-websockets-Aug-2012.html>
[LCWD] <http://www.w3.org/TR/2012/WD-websockets-20120809/>
[Diff]
<http://www.w3.org/2007/10/htmldiff?doc1=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2FTR%2F2012%2FWD-websockets-20120809%2F&doc2=http%3A%2F%2Fdev.w3.org%2Fhtml5%2Fwebsockets%2Fpublish%2FCR-websockets-Aug-2012.html>
[CfC-LCWD]
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2012JulSep/0249.html>
[18509] <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18509>
[18623] <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=18623>
[15209] <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15209>
[15210] <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=15210>
[17264] <https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=17264>
