On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Olli Pettay <olli.pet...@helsinki.fi> wrote:
> On 09/01/2012 11:38 PM, Rick Waldron wrote: > > So far, they all look async. Just calling them "sync" doesn't make them >> "sync". >> > > Sure they are sync. They are sync inside worker. We all know that we must > not introduce > new sync APIs in the main thread. > > > See my response to Oliver Hunt's message Rick