> From: Boris Zbarsky [mailto:bzbar...@mit.edu] > > On 9/21/12 12:39 PM, Travis Leithead wrote: > > I believe that firstly, the File API spec needs to be rationalized > against the URL API > > They're already there. File API explicitly says that if you support URL > API then you get a normal interface object and proto object. > > > Once that happens, I wonder if there are any other lingering objects for > which the "prototype-less" interface object would be needed. > > Well, any interface that only has static stuff and no actual objects > that implement it, right?
Yep. WebIDL _had_ modules support, but we all suggested it be removed since no one needed it. I'm only saying that I'm still not sure we'd need to re-introduce it. I'll side note that Windows 8's WinRT namespace (window.Windows) would require modules in order to specify all the supported features using WebIDL.
