Unless I've missed it, I don't believe the #PubRules provides guidelines on what documents are referenced by a spec and whether the reference is normative or non-normative. If I'm wrong, please point out the policy or pubrules text that addresses this issue.
Just to be clear, I don't object to including a non-normative reference to the WHATWG variant specification; however, if it is to be a normative reference, I'd like to insist it be the official W3C document that is referenced. On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]>wrote: > The W3C's process documents (e.g. #PubRules) define the policies for > publications and this issue will be addressed if/when the CR is actually > published. > > WebApps is simply a user of the publication policy. If you want to discuss > W3C processes such as PubRules, please use some other list - and not any of > WebApps' lists - such as public-w3cprocess #ProcCG. > > -Thanks, AB > > #PubRules > <http://www.w3.org/2005/07/**pubrules?uimode=filter<http://www.w3.org/2005/07/pubrules?uimode=filter> > > > #ProcCG > <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/**Public/public-w3process/<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-w3process/> > > > > On 11/16/12 8:51 AM, ext Ms2ger wrote: > >> I object to making such a change. >> >> On 11/16/2012 02:32 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: >> >>> Before going to CR, I believe the [HTML] entry in the references section >>> needs to be changed to reference an appropriate W3C specification. A >>> present, it reference a non-W3C document. >>> >> >
