On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 9:48 AM, Travis Leithead < [email protected]> wrote:
> >> When were you thinking of kicking off the DOM4 Events process?**** > > ** ** > > I'd like to have a draft up this week. We may also ask for a FPWD if we're > ready by the 10th. **** > > ** ** > > I want to have D4E rolling so that stuff we chose to punt from D3E has a > landing pad. > +1 This will make things a lot smoother for D3E I think and allows us to avoid stalling all DOM Event spec work while we try to finalize D3E. > **** > > *From:* [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Gary > Kacmarcik (?????????) > *Sent:* Friday, November 30, 2012 6:09 PM > *To:* Travis Leithead > *Cc:* Hallvord Reiar Michaelsen Steen; [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: Re: Event.key complaints?**** > > ** ** > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 4:29 PM, Travis Leithead < > [email protected]> wrote:**** > > Awesome stuff Gary.**** > > **** > > (And I like that we won't need to change the behavior of key or char in > your proposal—that part made me really nervous, since IE has shipped this > stuff since 9, and I know our new Win8 app model is using it.)**** > > **** > > I'm planning in the short term to start a new DOM4 Events spec, which will > be the successor to DOM3 Events. I brought this up at TPAC and there were > no objections. Gary, I'd love you collaboration on specifying your new > "code" property in that spec.**** > > ** ** > > Sounds good to me. I still have some comments to make on the DOM3 Events > spec, but I'll still send them out knowing that some of them will need to > be punted to DOM4.**** > > ** ** > > When were you thinking of kicking off the DOM4 Events process?**** > > ** ** > > -Gary**** > > ** ** >
