On Fri, 14 Dec 2012 00:04:20 +0100, Jonas Sicking <[email protected]> wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:00 AM, Henri Sivonen <[email protected]> wrote:
1. If DOCUMENT does not have a browsing context, Let TEMPLATE CONTENTS
OWNER be DOCUMENT and abort these steps.
2. Otherwise, Let TEMPLATE CONTENTS OWNER be a new Document node that
does not have a browsing context.
Is there a big win from this inconsistency? Why not always have a
separate doc as the template contents owner?
Or why not always use the owner document of the <template> element?
I think that would cause things like <img> elements to load.
Documents are fairly heavy-weight and introducing several documents
into the mix means that we have to deal with issues like making sure
that those documents have the same behavior (for example, if HTML
elements in those documents uppercase the nodeName or not)
/ Jonas
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
