On 12/10/12 5:12 PM, ext Joshua Bell wrote:
Given the state of the open issues, I'm content to wait until an
editor has bandwidth. I believe there is consensus on the resolution
of the issues and implementations are already sufficiently
interoperable so that adoption is not being hindered by the state of
the spec, but should still be corrected in this version before moving
forward.
Joshua, Jonas, Adrian, All,
If we go ahead with LCWD #2 for v1, which [Bugs] do you consider
showstoppers for LC #2?
Does anyone object to a v1 plan of LC#2 as the next publication (after
the showstopper bugs have been fixed)? (Of course we will have a CfC for
any publication proposals so I'm just looking for immediate feedback).
Joshua, Adrian - can you (or someone from your company) help with IDB
editing (at a minimum to address the showstopper bugs)?
-Thanks, AB
[Bugs]
<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WebAppsWG&component=Indexed%20Database%20API&resolution=---&list_id=3759>
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Arthur Barstow <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
It's been a month since we talked about the next publication
steps for the IDB spec (#Mins). Since then, I am not aware of any
work on the #LC-comments tracking. As such, here is a straw man
proposal to move v1 forward: ...
* Forget about processing #LC-comments
* Mark all open #Bugsfor v.next
* Start a CfC to publish a new LC based on the latest #ED "as is".
(If Jonas commitsto making some important changes, that would be
fine too but I don't think we want to includeany "feature creep"
or API breaks.)
Re v.Next, I recall Jonas said he was willing to continue to be an
Editor but I am not aware of anED being created. If/when a new ED
is created, we can work toward a FPWD.
Comments?
-Thanks, AB
#Mins <http://www.w3.org/2012/10/29-webapps-minutes.html#item16>
#Bugs
<https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/buglist.cgi?product=WebAppsWG&component=Indexed%20Database%20API&resolution=---&list_id=2509>
#ED <http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/Overview.html>
#LC-comments
<http://dvcs.w3.org/hg/IndexedDB/raw-file/tip/IndexedDB%20Disposition%20of%20Comments.html>
