On 23/01/2013 19:11 , Glenn Adams wrote:
were you able to incorporate the improvements I suggested at [1]?[1] https://github.com/darobin/webidl.js/pull/16
Well, it's an entirely different code base, so certainly not as is. But at least some of what you describe in there should be supported. (In webidl2.js that is, not idlharness.js).
-- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon
