> FWIW that looks good to me. At risk of bikeshedding, I think that calling a > repo with tests for non-HTML specs "html-testsuite" is confusing and will > make the repository harder to find, especially since the people who are aware > that html is not a catch-all term are also the people most likely to be > writing tests. Some more generic name like "web-platform-testsuite" seems > better.
Couldn't agree more. --tobie
