On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Andrew Fedoniouk <[email protected] > wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Kyle Huey <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Andrew Fedoniouk > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> At least it is easier than http://www.w3.org/TR/IndexedDB/ :) > > > > > > Easier doesn't necessarily mean better. LocalStorage is certainly > easier to > > use than any async storage system ;-) > > > > At least my implementation does not use any events. Proposed > system of events in IndexedDB is the antipattern indeed. Exactly for > the same reasons as finalizer *events* you've mentioned above - there > is no guarantee that all events will be delivered to the code awaiting > and relaying on them. > That's not true at all. If you don't understand the difference between finalizers and events you're not going to be able to make a very informed criticism of IndexedDB. - Kyle
