On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Boris Zbarsky <bzbar...@mit.edu> wrote:
> On 3/11/13 3:44 PM, Daniel Buchner wrote: > >> Just to be clear, these are callbacks (right?), meaning synchronous >> executions on one specific node. That is a far cry from the old issues >> with mutation events and nightmarish bubbling scenarios. >> > > Where does bubbling come in? > > The issue with _synchronous_ (truly synchronous, as opposed to end of > microtask or whatnot) callbacks is that they are required to fire in the > middle of DOM mutation while the DOM is in an inconsistent state of some > sort. This has nothing to do with bubbling and everything to do with what > happens when you append a node somewhere while it already has a parent and > it has a removed callback that totally rearranges the DOM in the middle of > your append. So does it actually need to be sync at that leve? I'm not sure why it does really. Can someone explain just for my own clarity? -Brian
