On Sat, 09 Feb 2013 02:11:41 +0100, Alex Mogilevsky
<alex...@microsoft.com> wrote:
± From: Pablo Flouret [mailto:pab...@motorola.com]
± Sent: Monday, February 4, 2013 12:47 PM
±
± On Mon, 04 Feb 2013 11:59:46 -0800, Alex Mogilevsky
<alex...@microsoft.com>
± wrote:
±
± > There was a discussion here a while ago on desired default behavior
± > for Enter in contenteditable and options for
± > execCommand("defaultParagraphSeparator"):
± >
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-whatwg-archive/2011May/thre
± > ad.html#msg171
± >
± > Did it ever get to consensus? Or is there new thinking on how that
± > should work?
±
± I implemented this in Opera and WebKit[1], can't really tell from the
± bugzilla bug if it's in firefox too[2], but i think they were on board
as
± well.
±
± [1] https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=59961
± [2] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748303
I can't find any documentation for any of the implementations, perhaps
you could answer if the following is true:
* The command name is "defaultParagraphSeparator", unprefixed
In Presto, it's "opera-defaultblock" (we implemented it before it was in
the spec).
* Argument is case insensitive
* The only available options are "P" and "DIV"
* Default is "P"
In Presto, yes.
Is that correct?
Thanks
Alex
--
Simon Pieters
Opera Software
